England should use the “better gamer” Coutinho trick with Salah to replace Klopp’s “easy option,”

On a different topic, I was surprised when Johnny Nic mentions Dunfermline having Ultras. I didn’t realize they had them, but why any group does? From the perspective that they appear to be more concerned with creating problem, the notion that these are your most devoted or best followers seems strange. Or are they all really superhuman beings, or have I missed something? One may assume that there is a greater likelihood of people attending activities if known immortals are prevented from doing so. They must serve as a deterrent to the most sensible followers of sports, after all. Unless selling knives or boots with steel toe caps, I’d assume there will be coming sponsors.

It does appear in some situations that they are actually fearful, with players and control hesitant to face physical attacks from ultras if they cross their path, and this is why after-game bowing we occasionally witness grovelling and apologizing after a decline. Just a thought as we wait for another encouraging England activity to end our slog of another global crack.
Paul McDevitt

READ MORE: &nbsp ,Enormous list of weird and first-time qualifying hopefuls shows massiveness of 2026 World Cup

Liverpool should move on
I agree with the mail sent in about Salah. Now is the perfect time for Liverpool to part ways with him. Salah can leave Liverpool and head to the sunset ( Saudi), where VVD is likely to be the last member of Klopps ‘ team. This is unusual because England don’t typically stay close to their star players for this much.

England may reflect on how they handled Coutinho’s departure ( a better person, in my opinion ). Although Rivals would like to claim that it was luck ( VVD and Alisson did help, though ), Klopp would later state that it was simpler to leave the young magician behind and to hope that he creates something special. Instead, the people had to look for alternatives and, to put it another way, assume responsibility for themselves.

Salah hasn’t missed many games while playing for the team, largely due to his unflagging injury record ( one thing we’ll lose as much as his goals ), but he did lose the team’s most crucial game, the 4:0 win against Barca, which was also significant. I’ve often wondered if the results would have been the same as it was after his performance, but I don’t think so. Although it could be said that the game was a coincidence, I found it rather funny that Liverpool’s just goal against PSG came actually moments after he was whistled off. The media was quick to show Mo Salah’s goals in the finals after the Carabao defeat, and the result is not as pleasing as a result. In addition, a penalty and assist in many finals is not enough for one goal. Although critics have long known that he poses the greatest threat to us and have developed strategies to prevent him, it is not surprising. When Salah is at his best, he is frequently unplayable, but when he is not, he can be too repetitive because he likes to reduce in while his perspective on achievements isn’t always the best. He struggled against Mendes, and I can still recall the time when he lost to Mata in OT and couldn’t stop him.

Privately, I believe Salah would have been much better if we had a healthy playwright. ( I’m a little jealous of Arsenal, but Saka has Odegaard in that regard. ) It is no coincidence that Salah’s best winter was a year prior to Coutinho’s and the Ox’s peak. Even Mo had some false aids thanks to Coutinho’s ball-clevering genius, who was also capable of unlocking the most cruel defense. Although The Ox was a little different, he was still there in full action. He appeared to have fallen off, able to prevent him. As City can attest, he had the ability to launch a rocket given that he had time and space, but more often than not he attracted ample players, allowing Salah to remain unharmed. Salah was arguably more dangerous than Salah, to put it another way. Due to our lack of that middle X factor for so much, we were not able to compete with Real and City, both of whom had better players in that area.

I realize I may have gone away. But Salah’s absence is crucial for England to begin a new century.
P Correa

Would you rather?
To Dion,

So again I ask, would Arsenal fans trade their last 4 trophyless years, for 1 FA &amp, 1 Carling Cup

As a Utd fan, Id much rather be in Arsenals position. Not particularly difficult, but firmly in the top 4 and only a few additions away from a title ( though we do not want that North London, you and the lads, psychological morons mentality ).

The final straw for us to hold onto is that we have been sh*t for centuries and still be able to boast about winning more prizes. If things were going as planned, we could perhaps do a barren run through all contests for a while. So, try to take the p*ss as much as you can while you can. You have all enjoyed ourselves for decades. The only top teams that actually need to be identified are United and City, according to
Jon, Cape Town ]

Quick suffix
In response to&nbsp, A, LFC, Montreals claim that United and City do not have the monopoly on the suffixes United and City: they are the only top teams that do so. You must claim the full name each time ( or at least add Person before the word ) if there are two Manchesters, and the word must be&nbsp to verify which one you are referring to. For instance, you don’t need to state United when referring to Leeds or Newcastle. If anyone really spoke about Sheffield Wednesday and United, they do have a similar problem.
French Fried ( Interestingly, foreign types used to refer to United as just Manchester, hence Robinhos confusion )