Now have Tichel and Premier League directors in conflict?[1945000]
Thomas Tuchel said he would take the same action as every other international trainer, warning all Premier League professionals. The national press had to find other ways to dang a newspaper back page out of the England manager when international breaks occur.
A right Tuch
They have, to their credit, discovered a perpetual solution by pretending Tuchel and club bosses are at war. The Sun
claim that Tuchel will not show mercy to Prem bosses, which is odd when no one has requested such a courtesy because it would be strange. TUCH FIGHT CLUB screams the Daily Mirror as John Cross claims that Tuchel is prepared to clash with Premier League managers and even criticizes Mikel Arteta over Declan Rice.
The Timesparrots that collision course line.
Ian Ladyman of the Daily Mail  , claims he laid down the law by saying he will put Englands needs ahead of those of top-flight clubs. But, like every previous global manager? Imagine how crazy it would be if he had come out and told all leagues they had primary hands before working around it.
The Daily Telegraphcalls it a warning and The Guardian reckon Tuchel will risk the wrath of club managers, while the Daily Express believe he even had a go at Arteta.
Its time to look at these quotes because Mediawatch has obviously overlooked a massive news story here .
Declan Rice played the second game against Arsenal after a 7-1 first foot. They must have a lot of thought about us, I didn’t get that experience. Therefore, I don’t believe we should argue this.
Also thats certainly a great start. A reminder that Tuchels is being taken advantage of by Arteta (The Sun website), he is also taking him personally. In fact, he claims that England will continue to prioritize its requirements over those of its rival clubs, and that this is true. He actually says that in particular.
I take care about the people. The plan is important to us. However, if you told players right away that you have tough ( club ) matches in hand, I’m sorry for you. We have a qualifying game, and we do what works best for us. We have spoken with the venues. We won’t get any unethical risks because we are monitoring at the highest level where the positions are known.
Because I believe in the players first. The person should not suffer any harm. Because I want to see it, I want the players to watch them all reach the Champions League quarter-finals. In the end, we focus on [ourselves] and the venues focus on themselves. And the primary concern is with the people. The absurdity of trying to create some sort of conflict between Tuchel and club managers is uncovered in almost every line of
; however, that last line is extremely telling: In the end, the clubs take care of themselves and we take care of ourselves. And the primary concern is with the people.
Motion COURSE.
MORE ENGLAND REACTION FROM F365]
Keane warns England star that he won’t be playing in his next game after failing to impress Tuchel
People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw Stones
[]People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw Stones]
They all quote Guardiola as saying,” I’ve never been so unhappy about how Stones handled his injury before last season’s important Premier and Champions League games.” The Spaniard is just strange because no one quotes him as saying,” In friendly activities you may become injured.
That does seem important given that Tuchel and Stones were particularly discussing group choice for World Cup finals while Stones was excessively starting back-to-back friendlies in a matter of days. This concept is being contested by Tuchel and team managers again
. Show us a second Premier League manager who believes their fit and applicable players shouldn’t be selected for dynamic international games[19459027]It would be better if we could leave this complete non-story behind, but James Gray writes:
We regretfully leave. He made a clear statement to his visitors over the weekend that he would be picking gamers based on their goals, not those of their main employers, or any other Premier League heavyweights, while he was sat in an upstairs room of Tottenham Hotspur’s state-of-the-art training facility. There are two things
:]1 ) It is unmissable that every international manager has always done that.
2 ) Tuchels first England club features one Spur person, with Dominic Solanke likely to miss out. Heels are not involved at this point if incident programs are being considered and risked, which they are not.
Yet it seems likely that some managers will pick out Tuchel’s terms cruelly. According to him, we are in contact with the leagues, we won’t get any disrespectful challenges, and our main concern is taking care of the people, which is probably what Mediawatch has read.
At this difficult time, give Guardiola and Arteta pause as their players are being held hostage by this vile lunatic.
Next up are Guardiola’s alleged references to Stones ‘ main argument being that the defender started games after each one. Finally, Tuchel insists that he hasn’t received any requests from supervisors this time around for people to get rested or replaced first. At this point, we do have to ask why we were all present.
Gray finally goes to great lengths to clarify how terrible Latvia are and how Lee Carsley’s Under-21s would expect them to overcome them, but Tuchel shouldn’t select his best people.
It is a absurd and amusing discussion. Do those U21 people ‘ team professionals suddenly agree that their players were chosen for the senior team that appeared to be utterly dangerous? Did people take it as collateral deterioration in the far more significant desire of Tuchel staying on Vincent Kompany’s part in an alternate reality where Tuchel rests Harry Kane, Jude Bellingham, Declan Rice, and the rest of his best players and England lose or draw?
How would Myles Lewis-Skelly feel if a second 90-minute game against Real Madrid in two weeks ended in a hamstring injury?
Probably quite frustrated. Would he beg Tuchel to be punished forever for choosing him for England? It seems unlikely. Then comes the headliner, all the way down in the closing paragraph:
Gareth Southgate redefines what it meant to play for the national team, breaking down the club cliques that proved to be antagonistic in the past. A high-risk strategy that could derail much of that excellent work could be used to begin a fight with Premier League clubs at a time when players have never been more stale.
Five paragraphs earlier, Gray himself made the irrelevant case that Guardiola was upset at Southgate for choosing Stones. It almost seems as though Southgate always chose his best team and thus invariably his best players because it was his job, despite all the positive work he did as manager.
And Southgate made a remarkable change in defining what it meant to play for the national team, even if, in the first year of his departure, we are suggesting he should select a half-strength side for an actual World Cup qualifier out of concern for Premier League managers ( none of whom have shown even the slightest hint of being upset because obviously ) Is the selection of the best players to represent them in any other country’s media this absurd?
The depressing response is already known by Mediawatch.
READ NEXT: Tuchel looked shaken by England mediocrity, he is destined to fail and be worse than Southgate
